1066AD – a date enshrined in every history of England, all
because of a battle that took place on Senlac ridge on 14th October.
History is written by the victors, we inherit their
narrative. Having always had an interest
in the so-called “Dark Ages”, it always struck me as odd that English history
didn’t seem to really get going until William the Conqueror took to the throne.
All the kings of Anglo-Saxon England
were footnotes, with the exception of Alfred the Great of course. Growing up in
the 1970s we still has access to atlases
with maps still swathed in pink, and history books still full of
imperial pomposity. The conquest was the beginning of British greatness
according to these texts.
But things had changed, even as a child I could see through
those old books. The empire itself had been founded on conquest and oppression abroad and poverty and industrial pollution at home. By the 70s decolonisation was all but complete, on the news there
was industrial strife, the troubles in Northern Ireland rumbled on with no end in sight, shop shelves had sugar shortages and black outs seemed
common place. Mind you, saying that the
music was great… apart from Boney M and the Smurfs of course.
To believe those old history books Anglo-Saxon society had
got as far as it could possibly go and the imposition of Norman overlords was ultimately a good thing. The upper echelons of the pre-conquest society was
primitive. The conquering Normans brought order and modernity, in societal
structure, architecture and warfare.Their victory at Hastings was nearly guaranteed, with their
use of cavalry, foot soldiers and archers. How could the Anglo Saxons hope to
compete with their archaic shieldwall tactics? Those stupid Anglo-Saxon Fyrdmen -
enticed to their doom by William’s reigned retreats! But then you ask yourself;
what if their discipline had held, what would have happened then?
In Spear Havoc 1066 – Alternative Histories, Norse historic
fiction author par excellence C R May explores several intriguing differing
outcomes to our historical reality. Each alternative is presented as a short
story, followed by an afterword exploring the author’s reasoning. Each is perfectly
feasible and, for those of us who hold with the theory of an infinite multiverse,
may very well exist on different timelines.
Thus the author invites us to ponder the differing outcomes
that could quite easily have occurred; what if Harald Hardrada had been killed
prior to his campaign with Tostig Godwinsson?
How untroubled would the succession have been, if Edward the Exile hadn’t
mysteriously died on arrival in England? What if the Confessor had died a year
earlier before the sundering of the Godwinssons?
These are a few among twelve possibilities and, as any
reader of Mr May’s will already attest, each is well described the author’s
prose capturing the excitement of battle and the cut and thrust of political
rivalries. Refreshingly, the author doesn’t just present us with Harold good,
William bad scenarios, instead we have family rivalry and dynastic ambitions
from many quarters; the realpolitik of the time. For the casual reader, or
student of the conquest period, I would heartily recommend getting this book as
it expands understanding of the world of Harold and William, beyond the historical
narrative we all know.
It’s heartening to think that somewhere in the multiverse
there maybe a present as framed in the tale of Tostig the Peace Weaver. What
present is that you ask? I encourage you to get this book and find out!
No comments:
Post a Comment